RuneTrack Forums
It is currently Wed Mar 12, 2025 2:38 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2018 6:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:04 am
Posts: 658
With the 76ers serving Adidas Stan Smith Mujer as one of the leagues youngest, and most exciting teams, it’s curious why Nike Air Presto Dámské no one has decided to capitalize on the team’s young superstars.

Now granted, these conversations could very well be taking place in a boardroom as we speak, but if they aren’t they definitely should be.With the 76ers’ having sold out their season ticket plans Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 Dam for the 207-2018 season, there is obviously Nike Free Run 2.0 Dam Sixers mania bubbling up to the surface, and plenty of those fans, myself included, would love to rock a pair of Process 1s.Nike Inc.'s knitted shoe upper technology, which it calls FlyKnit, has been lucrative.

Since it was introduced in February 2012, the FlyKnit technology has adorned several shoes and brought in Nike Air Max Force 1 Dámské well over $1 billion in sales.

The technology has also spurred a back-and-forth with Adidas AG since 2012 over its patentability.

On Thursday, Adidas filed an appeal with the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals contesting an Oct. 19 decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board upholding Nike's patent for the knitted Nike Air VaporMax Dam upper technology.

The "'749 Patent," obtained in 2004, gives Nike ownership of the invention of a shoe upper that is knitted by a machine from a single piece of Nike Air Zoom Mariah Flyknit Dámské yarn, creating a tube-like structure that is then cut and Adidas EQT Support ADV Mujer attached to the sole of the shoe, as well as the methods of manufacturing that type of upper. The technology reduces the labor, material and time needed to produce each shoe.In its appeal, Adidas claims that this type of construction is unpatentable according to Title 35, Section 103 of U.S. patent law, which states Nike Roshe Run Dam Rosa that a patent for an invention may not be claimed if the invention "would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."

In other words, a person with at least a few years of experience in the Nike Air Max 90 Dámské Růžové footwear industry would have understood that the knitting technology was an option for creating footwear before Nike filed the patent.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group